AMD EPYC 7573X: specs and benchmarks
Aggregated performance score
EPYC 7573X provides outstanding benchmark performance at 44.89% of a leader's which is a 96-core Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX.
Summary
AMD started EPYC 7573X sales 22 March 2022. This is a Milan-X architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at professional systems. It has 32 cores and 64 threads, and is based on 7 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3600 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket SP3 processor with a TDP of 280 Watt. It supports DDR4-3200 memory.
Primary details
EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
Place in performance ranking | 38 | |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.06 | |
Market segment | Server | |
Architecture codename | Milan-X (2022) | |
Release date | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) | |
Current price | $4598 | of 15701 (Xeon Platinum 8276L) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | |
Threads | 64 | |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | of 4.7 (Ryzen 9 7900X) |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | of 6.2 (Core i9-14900KS) |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | of 7475.2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core) |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | of 98304 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX) |
L3 cache | 768 MB (shared) | |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | of 3 (Apple M3 Max 16-Core) |
Die size | 8x 81 mm2 | |
Number of transistors | 33,200 million | of 92000 (Apple M3 Max 16-Core) |
64 bit support | - | |
Unlocked multiplier | No |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H) |
Socket | SP3 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 280 Watt | of 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | |
AVX | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by EPYC 7573X's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.
PCIe version | 4.0 | of 5 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX) |
PCI Express lanes | 128 |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of EPYC 7573X. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Send your test results of EPYC 7573X.
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.